By Bill Smith
Ex-coach
Jim O’Brien has said that the $6,000 given to the family of Aleksandar
Radojevic was done for humanitarian reasons and had nothing to do with
Aleksandar being a potential recruit.
Reports of statements from Aleksandar supported that position. Given the
nature of war-torn Montenegro
(part of the area formerly known as Yugoslavia), it is not hard to
believe that the family needed help. If
the money was given for humanitarian reasons, O’Brien was punished for a good
deed. Admittedly, a little glow of the
good deed wore off when he failed to mention his gift to the University for
five years.
In
addition the suit by Kathleen Salyers concerning benefits to Boban Savovic,
another player from that area, raised flags of possible impropriety. While her claims for repayment are in
dispute, there can be no doubt that Boban received assistance above that of a
non-athlete. It has not been established
that Coach O’Brien had knowledge of the arrangement and he had a clean record
in his previous head coaching assignments at St. Bonaventure and Boston College.
Ohio State
did the right thing by terminating him.
The NCAA came down on OSU including the forfeiture of $800,000 in
revenue from NCAA Championship tournament appearances as well as the wins
achieved in those contests. The
University had no other choice and took action quickly.
I am
not going to get into the case of O’Brien vs. OSU. That is not the point here.
There
is some question about exactly when the gift was made. According to one interpretation of NCAA
rules, if O’Brien knew that Aleksandar was not eligible because he had been
paid to play in Europe, the gift would not
have been a violation. If he did not
know, then it was a violation. The
question boils down to “What did he know, and when did he know it?” As worn as that question is, there is
something much more worn that must be addressed soon—the NCAA thousands of Thou
shall not’s of their rulebook.
In the
case between OSU and O’Brien, David Swank, the former head of the NCAA
Committee on Infractions, said in documents filed with the court that the gift
was made after O’Brien knew that Aleksandar had turned pro. That meant that the gift was not a
violation. It is clear that the NCAA
rules are too numerous, subject to interpretation, and unclear!
Because
Aleksandar had played pro ball, regardless of what was in Coach O’Brien’s head
or heart, the player could never have been a qualified college recruit for OSU
or any other university. Therefore,
nothing about the transaction could be a violation in the minds of reasonable
people. Intent doesn’t matter. Knowledge or lack there of doesn’t
matter. What does matter is even a
former head of the NCAA Infractions Committee disagreed with the heavy handed
actions of that institution. In April of
2007, the NCAA appeals committee threw out the violations against O’Brien
concerning Aleksandar. Did they come to
the conclusion that the charges were mute?
No, instead the only reason the committee threw out the charges was the
failure of the enforcement staff to notify OSU by the deadline. The notification came 2 days late. As a result, O’Brien’s suspension was
reduced.
The
action suggests that the NCAA has decided to utilize “thought police.” More than OSU, or other colleges, it is the
NCAA that must clean up its act and get off the thrown of omnipotence. This is just one of dozens of heavy handed
and mindless judgments that the NCAA has made.
Lord Acton said “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts
absolutely.” It is the universities that
have the product that generates the millions of dollars in college sports. If the NCAA is not careful, it may lose the
keys to the golden Cadillac to a less power hungry and money-grubbing
organization. The Universities may
realize that the NCAA needs them far more than they need it.